Wednesday, February 06, 2008

The Importance of being Elite

The quality of umpiring by the men in the Elite panel is getting worse by the day. The umpiring in the India-Australia test series was the worst that I have seen in recent times with about 30 odd bad decisions in the 4 test matches. Some of these decisions were horrendous to say the least. Unfortunately the blunders were not restricted to a single person and all the 4 umpires who officiated had their share of booboos. Ofcourse Steve Bucknor was the worst of the lot and was sent home, this was only because of the impact that his decisions had on the outcome of the Sydney test match. The umpiring errors in the other matches were considered to have evened out between the two sides and hence were not talked about in great detail.
The image “http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/a/a9/180px-SteveBucknor.JPG” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

The sad part is that it has not stopped there. We saw a horrendous decision from Rudi Koertzen in the second ODI of the CB series and that was not the first time we are seeing a blunder from this man. Ofcourse I completely agree that umpiring is a difficult job and mistakes are bound to happen at times. But it is the frequency of these mistakes and the sheer absurdity of the mistakes made that calls for an upheaval of the Elite Panel. If memory serves me right the ICC used to have a yardstick wherein the elite umpires were ones who got more than 95% decisions right or something like that. It is all right on paper but the ICC does not have any monitoring system whereby the umpires are continually monitored so that they maintain their level of performance.

Atleast this news release I read today seems to suggest that the ICC are realising the need to do something about it:

ICC to appoint selectors to choose umpires

Dubai: The International Cricket Council (ICC) is set to appoint a four-member selection panel for the appointment of umpires, it is learnt here. According to the highly placed sources in the ICC, the panel members will be named before March this year.

The new panel will be responsible for the nomination of the Elite Panel Umpires List. The panel will also hike the present number of umpires from ten to twelve.

Till now the appointment of the Elite Panel Umpires was governed by the ICC management. However, perhaps to avoid controversies surrounding them, the ICC may not be wishing to have repeats of Darrell Hair and Steve Bucknor incidents in future.

It was not known whether the postings of the new Elite Panel umpires and referees for the different series would be named by the new selectors or would be done by Doug Cowie, the 61-year-old ICC'manager for umpires. He was one of New Zealand's leading umpires.

The future of these two controversial umpires whose contracts expire in March this year also will rest with the new selection panel.

While it is welcome to note that there will now be selectors for the Elite umpires, the increase in the number of umpires from 10 to 12 is definitely not good enough. There are 10 test playing countries and one would think that atleast 20 top notch umpires wont be too difficult to find. With the amount of cricket being played there is too much load on these 10-12 umpires, which might actually be the underlying cause for the deteriorating quality of umpiring.

Lets hope that the focus in the coming matches will be on the players rather than the men in the white coats!!

Labels: , , ,

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Irrespective of how many elite umpires the ICC is going to have, its high time to get the technology used better. How abt starting with 3 appeals per team for a Onedayer..Its a very very far deal.

With so much of tech involved in match telecasts, we spectators are exposed to more incorrect decisions than before. When we had no snickometers or lbw ball trajectory estimation, most of the umpires looked great. God knows how bad the great Dickie Bird or David Shepard was...My vote is for Tech rather than increasing the Elite umpires

6:29 pm  
Blogger Raj said...

Yes Viswa, Technology is another way of looking at it...though it has its own positives and negatives as well...for example all the technology is currently owned by the broadcasters and dependence on them in not very reliable..also Snicko,Hawk-eye are not yet foolproof..The referral system might be a good idea but I am a lover of the human element in cricket and hence would not like to see too much technology in the game.
I dont think anybody will have a problem if a faint edge is missed or a marginal lbw is given/not given. It is the big edges and the obvious decisions that need to be correctly judged and a good umpire will get those right.

8:19 pm  
Blogger Vijay Vaidyanathan said...

Why is it that there are so many errors of late?

As you said, they are the "elite" members. Then how come they've become erroneous? Are they getting complacent (or old :):):) )? Or as you've said they're just overloaded.


Another thing: Can you change your blog background/font. It is very difficult to read the small font in a black background. Eyes are getting strained. And worse is seeing a bright white screen for entering the comments after seeing the black main screen.

10:22 pm  
Blogger Raj said...

Sure Vijay, will work on that!!

7:46 pm  
Blogger Sreenidhi Krishnamoorthy said...

After reading your blog and also all the comments, I still feel that decisions whenever necessary must be referred upstairs. Why not use the technology when available. Sure, it takes away the human element, but this is happening everywhere now...Automatic machines replacing manual ones etc... We have to change with the times, and now is the time of technology

12:18 pm  
Blogger Raj said...

@Sreenidhi - 'This is the time of technology'...yes but Technology replacing human element will totally change cricket as we have known it.
Well hope supporters of technology wont be asking for robots to replace the men in the middle!!!

4:51 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home