Friday, February 22, 2008

India @U19 World Cup

The Under-19 World Cup is currently being played in Kualalampur,Malaysia.
The Indian team has been performing admirably and have won all 3 matches in their group stages and are through to the Quarterfinals.

Young Virat Kohli looks terrific with the bat and it should not be long before he makes it to the Indian team:


Pradeep Sangwan seems to be yet another good left arm quickie in the pipeline. It is strange how India is now producing so many left arm quicks:

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Messers Duckworth and Lewis!!

http://cache.viewimages.com/xc/1912720.jpg?v=1&c=ViewImages&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF19390335F8FA9CA92A6CB8DEEF980A681D99930FDCFC4C15FBB
If there is one thing in cricket which I do not understand, it is the famous Duckworth-Lewis system. In fact it would be fair to say that I do not make head or tail of it.

Just take yesterdays example:
Ind v S.Lanka
Match is reduced to 29 overs - India bat first and make 195 for 5 in the 29 overs - Rain comes down and match is reduced to 21 overs - Revised target is 154 from 21 overs for the Lankans which is a slightly greater required rate than the original score but with 8 lesser overs.

Eng v NZland
Englan bat first - Rain comes after 12 overs and match reduced to a 36 over game - Eng are bowled out for 158 in 35 overs - You would think that would be the target but no! it is 165 to win in 36 overs for Nzland!!

Explain somebody...pleaseeee!!!

For people interested to go through the intricacies of the method. You can find it here.



Labels: , ,

Friday, February 08, 2008

Taufel Speaks

On the same lines as my previous post, read an interview given by Simon Taufel, regarded as the best umpire around. Some points he made were pretty interesting.

Answering a question on the role of media he says:

"
All I would like to see from the media is balanced reporting – we don’t seem to get much credit for all the good decisions we make and when the odd error is made, then that is where the focus and comment is on. How many times does a good decision get replayed on TV or noted in the press? Compare this to an error! The media and paying public expect perfection from all match officials all of the time – a tough ask don’t you think?

We cannot be perfect but we can be excellent."

I think that this is a very valid point and it seems like the media of today is bent upon sensationalizing things rather than presenting it in proper perspective.

When asked if increasing the number of umpires would help in reducing stress he makes another interesting reply:

"Stress? What is stress? Like pressure, stress only exists if you let it. An increased number of international Emirates Elite Panel umpires will allow more potential for recovery periods which is a good thing and should help match officials recover and prepare for series providing they use the time and opportunity wisely. At this point in time, the amount of cricket played in the year is not the issue for me but how much time there is to recover in between appointments."

You can find the full interview here.

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

The Importance of being Elite

The quality of umpiring by the men in the Elite panel is getting worse by the day. The umpiring in the India-Australia test series was the worst that I have seen in recent times with about 30 odd bad decisions in the 4 test matches. Some of these decisions were horrendous to say the least. Unfortunately the blunders were not restricted to a single person and all the 4 umpires who officiated had their share of booboos. Ofcourse Steve Bucknor was the worst of the lot and was sent home, this was only because of the impact that his decisions had on the outcome of the Sydney test match. The umpiring errors in the other matches were considered to have evened out between the two sides and hence were not talked about in great detail.
The image “http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/a/a9/180px-SteveBucknor.JPG” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

The sad part is that it has not stopped there. We saw a horrendous decision from Rudi Koertzen in the second ODI of the CB series and that was not the first time we are seeing a blunder from this man. Ofcourse I completely agree that umpiring is a difficult job and mistakes are bound to happen at times. But it is the frequency of these mistakes and the sheer absurdity of the mistakes made that calls for an upheaval of the Elite Panel. If memory serves me right the ICC used to have a yardstick wherein the elite umpires were ones who got more than 95% decisions right or something like that. It is all right on paper but the ICC does not have any monitoring system whereby the umpires are continually monitored so that they maintain their level of performance.

Atleast this news release I read today seems to suggest that the ICC are realising the need to do something about it:

ICC to appoint selectors to choose umpires

Dubai: The International Cricket Council (ICC) is set to appoint a four-member selection panel for the appointment of umpires, it is learnt here. According to the highly placed sources in the ICC, the panel members will be named before March this year.

The new panel will be responsible for the nomination of the Elite Panel Umpires List. The panel will also hike the present number of umpires from ten to twelve.

Till now the appointment of the Elite Panel Umpires was governed by the ICC management. However, perhaps to avoid controversies surrounding them, the ICC may not be wishing to have repeats of Darrell Hair and Steve Bucknor incidents in future.

It was not known whether the postings of the new Elite Panel umpires and referees for the different series would be named by the new selectors or would be done by Doug Cowie, the 61-year-old ICC'manager for umpires. He was one of New Zealand's leading umpires.

The future of these two controversial umpires whose contracts expire in March this year also will rest with the new selection panel.

While it is welcome to note that there will now be selectors for the Elite umpires, the increase in the number of umpires from 10 to 12 is definitely not good enough. There are 10 test playing countries and one would think that atleast 20 top notch umpires wont be too difficult to find. With the amount of cricket being played there is too much load on these 10-12 umpires, which might actually be the underlying cause for the deteriorating quality of umpiring.

Lets hope that the focus in the coming matches will be on the players rather than the men in the white coats!!

Labels: , , ,